An interactive globe comparing how six jurisdictions build cybersecurity and cybercrime capacity — the United States, Germany for the EU, Brazil, Colombia, Singapore and Estonia — with Mexico as a reference point. Drag to rotate; select a country, by marker or by name button, to open its profile across six dimensions.
Comparative analysis
Cyber Lessons for Mexico
How six jurisdictions build cybersecurity and cybercrime capacity — the United States, the EU (with Germany), Brazil, Colombia, Singapore and Estonia — mapped across six dimensions, with Mexico as a reference point. Drag to spin the globe; click a marker, or a name below it, to open one.
Method — functional equivalence (Dolowitz & Marsh, 2000): copying → emulation → hybridization → inspiration.
Drag to spin · click a marker to open it
One dimension across the six
Mexico is the reference point, shown on the globe — these six are the mapped comparators.
Five recurring patterns
Three key trade-offs
Recommendations
Real cybercrime capacity is an inter-branch effort. Some measures fall within an institution’s existing authority; the larger reforms need new legislation, treaties and judicial training — and one precondition underpins them all.
Want the full paper?
This interactive map distills the comparative research I did at Stanford. Email me and I’ll send the full paper — complete analysis, methodology and citations.
Request the paper →From my comparative research on national cybersecurity and cybercrime policy frameworks. Sources are linked within each jurisdiction. © 2026 Gianmarco Coronado Graci.